IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K.N. BINOJ – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P4 application filed by the petitioner to remove the entry in the data bank as applied by the petitioner in Exhibit P4.
ii. to grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case.
iii. Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents produced as Exhibits in the writ petition."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P4 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The additional 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P4 application to the
2nd respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as pos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.