IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THAIKKATTUKARA JAMA ATH EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF TOWN PLANNER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
“i. To call for entire records leading to passing of Exhibit P7 notice issued by the 4th respondent and set it aside by a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction.
ii. To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ direction or order directing the 2nd and 4th respondents to consider Exhibit P8 application for regularization submitted by the petitioner within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. iii. To permit the petitioner to dispense with production of translations of the exhibits in vernacular language along with the Writ Petition.
iv. To pass any other order or directions this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case .” [sic]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P7 order, which is issued in accordance with Sec.235W(1) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act . According to the petitioner, the petitioner already filed Ext.P8 regularization application and in the meanwhile, the Panchayat is proceeding with Ext.P7 order.
3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Panchayat and the Government Ple
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.