SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52311

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
NITHYA MOL P.R. – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.T.S.SARATH, SMT.SAILAKSHMI MENON, SMT.JOTHISHA K.A., SMT.SHIFANA M.
For the Respondents: SRI.M.R.ARUNKUMAR, SRI.P.SHAMMI NAVAS

Sathish Ninan, J.

The parties have settled their disputes in mediation. They have entered into a memorandum of agreement incorporating the terms of settlement. The Mat. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement. The memorandum of agreement will form part of this judgment.

The key of the locker has been handed over to the counsel appearing for the appellant and the same is recorded.

Sd/-

Sathish Ninan, Judge Sd/-

P. Krishna Kumar, Judge SVP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top