Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52312

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
NAJEEB RAHIMAN – Appellant
Versus
BUSHARA – Respondent
Mat. Appeal No. 431 of 2015

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.), SMT.M.M.DEEPA, SRI.UNNI SEBASTIAN KAPPEN
For the Respondents: SRI.RAJIT

Court recognizes and enforces mediated settlement terms in matrimonial disputes.

Headnote:In this matrimonial appeal, the parties have resolved their disputes through mediation, resulting in a memorandum of agreement outlining the settlement terms. The court disposes of the appeal in accordance with this settlement, which will be included as part of the judgment. The court emphasizes that the resolution was amicably reached between the parties.

Sathish Ninan, J.

The parties have settled their disputes in mediation. They have entered into a memorandum of agreement incorporating the terms of settlement. The Mat. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement. The memorandum of agreement will form part of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52312

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMSathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJNAJEEB RAHIMAN – AppellantVersusBUSHARA – RespondentMat. Appeal No. 431 of 2015

Court recognizes and enforces mediated settlement terms in matrimonial disputes.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
NAJEEB RAHIMAN – Appellant
Versus
BUSHARA – Respondent
Mat. Appeal No. 431 of 2015