SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ROJER MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2491 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.K.AJITHKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.R.HARISHANKAR

The Corporation cannot recover property tax beyond three years prior to demand notices as established by prior legal rulings.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The judgment references Sec. 539 of the Kerala Municipality Act regarding the limitation on property tax recovery. Facts: The petitioners disputed demand notices for property tax from 2016-2025. Findings: The court found the demand notices invalid based on prior rulings.

Issues: The main question involved the legality of property tax demands beyond three years.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Corporation cannot collect tax arrears beyond three years.

Result: The writ petition was disposed of quashing the demand notices with directions for fresh assessment.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are the joint owners of the building Nos.

2153, 2154, 2155 and 2155A in division No.46 of the 1st respondent Corporation. The grievance highlighted by the petitioners pertains to Exts.P4 to P7 demand notices issued to the petitioners, requiring them to pay property tax in respect of the said building from the year 2016-17 onwards till 2024-25. The challenge raised by the petitioner is mainly on the reason that, the said notices are hit by the period of limitation contemplated under Sec.539 of the Kerala Municipality Act . 2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel for the respondents, I find merits in the challenge raised by the petitioner. This is particularly because, the contentions raised by the petitioners is already settled by this Court in The Gateway Hotels v. Kochi Municipal Corporation in WP(C) NO. 16984 OF 2020 and connected cases, wherein this Court has categorically held that the Corporation/Municipality cannot recover the arrears of property tax beyond a period of three years preceding to the date of the demand. The said judgment is already upheld by the Division Bench of this Court as well.

3. In such circumstances, interference is required.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of quashing Exts.P4 to P7, with a direction to the respondents, to issue a fresh assessment order and demand, confining the period of assessment to three years preceding to the date of Exts.P4 to P7.

As the petitioners have already made the payment of tax from 2021-2022 based on the interim order passed by this Court, it is ordered that, amount paid by the petitioners shall be given due credit in the tax assessed as referred to above.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

JUDGE SM/2211 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2491/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 29-

3-2019 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED

8-10-2024 ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 22-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top