Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AKSHAY THAMPI, ANANDU THAMPI, SANAL BHASKAR, SAJITH BHASKAR, AKHIL DIVAKARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amicable settlement permitting quashing of non-heinous offenses. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties resolved disputes and learned counsel confirm settlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's authority to quash based on prior rulings. (Para 6) |
| 4. court decision to quash case reinforces judicial efficiency. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 5 in Crime No.966 of 2024 registered by the Kottiyam Police Station, Kollam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 296 (b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and 110 read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 3 to 6, who have executed Annexure A3 and Annexure A4 series affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the respondents 3 to 6.
4. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
