Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
LARISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing due to settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel reports amicable resolution between parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court affirms inherent powers to quash non-heinous cases. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.106 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-III, North Paravur, which has arisen from Crime No.733 of 2019 registered by the North Paravur Police Station, Ernakulam alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 451 , 294(b) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A3 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the interv
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
