IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SUBASH P.B – Appellant
Versus
NISIL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations under bharatiya nyaya sanhita. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties have submitted settlements to the court. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. criteria for quashing proceedings based on settlement. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.684 of
2025 registered by the Palluruthy Kasaba Police Station, Ernakulam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 296 (b), 351 and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the respondents 1 and 2, who have executed Annexures B and C affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The respon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.