Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THANGAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (ERNAKULAM) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for fee refund and its administrative handling. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's directive for prompt consideration of petitions. (Para 3) |
| 3. order for action to be taken within two months. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the second respondent to dispose the P9 request of the petitioner received in the office of second respondent on 05.08.2022 to return the fee of Rs. 234800.00 collected to change the nature of 05.87 ares of unnotified land of petitioner from Nilam to Purayidam, within a time frame fixed by this honourable court.
(ii) Issue such other writ or orders or directions, which this Honourable court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and circumstances of the case”
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this writ petition is to consider Ext.P9 request of the petitioner for refund of the amount collected.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think, there can be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P9 within a time frame.
Therefore, this
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
