Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SNEHA K.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KAKKANAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for consideration of application under a specific statute. (Para 2) |
| 2. the court hears counsel and considers the need for direction. (Para 3) |
| 3. court mandates timelines for report submission and application consideration. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, order, or direction commanding the 1 st and 2 nd respondents herein to consider and dispose of Ext. P6 Form No. 6 application within a time specified by this Hon’ble Court by allowing it.
ii. To dispense the production of the English translation of Malayalam Exhibits, which is in vernacular language.
iii. Issue such other order or direction as may be necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P6 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to conside
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
