IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SNEHA K.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KAKKANAD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, order, or direction commanding the 1 st and 2 nd respondents herein to consider and dispose of Ext. P6 Form No. 6 application within a time specified by this Hon’ble Court by allowing it.
ii. To dispense the production of the English translation of Malayalam Exhibits, which is in vernacular language.
iii. Issue such other order or direction as may be necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P6 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P6 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P6 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised Officer within a period of on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.