The court establishes that timely consideration of applications under specific statutes is mandated, ensuring adherence to procedural regulations.

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, order, or direction commanding the 1 st and 2 nd respondents herein to consider and dispose of Ext. P6 Form No. 6 application within a time specified by this Hon’ble Court by allowing it.

ii. To dispense the production of the English translation of Malayalam Exhibits, which is in vernacular language.

iii. Issue such other order or direction as may be necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case."

[SIC]

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P6 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P6 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 4^th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P6 application to the 2^nd respondent/Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 2^nd respondent/Authorised O consider the Ext.P6 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4^th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2^nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2^nd and 4^th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE AJ