JAYSEED, JAMSHEED, SHAFI, FARIS, FARSEED, RASHID, MUHAMMAD MUSHRAF K, MOOSA vs STATE OF KERALA, SUNEER BABU, ASAINAR, AJMAL, SIDHEEQ

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52600

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
JAYSEED, JAMSHEED, SHAFI, FARIS, FARSEED, RASHID, MUHAMMAD MUSHRAF K, MOOSA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA, SUNEER BABU, ASAINAR, AJMAL, SIDHEEQ – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AMAL PARTHASARADHY
For the Respondents: SRI.GIBI.C.GEORGE

Table of Content
1. quashing based on mutual settlement. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by counsel regarding resolution. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning for exercising inherent powers. (Para 6 , 7)

C.S.DIAS, J.

---------------------------------------

Crl.M.C. No.8880 OF 2025 -----------------------------------------

Dated this the 17^th day of November, 2025 ORDER The petitioners are the accused 1 to 8 in C.C.No.377/2021 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Perinthalmanna, which has arisen from Crime No.44/2021, registered by the Wandoor Police Station, Malappuram alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 294(b) read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surksha Sanhita , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 5, who have executed Annexures-A3 to A6 affidavits, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document