Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SUBIRAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused invoke inherent jurisdiction for quashing based on amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsels indicate resolution with no opposition for quashing. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court affirms power to quash on grounds of settlement and non-seriousness. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. all proceedings against petitioners are quashed. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.C.No.195 of 2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Attingal, which was originally numbered as C.C.No.454 of 2005 and which has arisen from Crime No.125 of 2005 registered by the Kilimanoor Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 4, who have executed Annexures 2 to 4 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
