Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ARYA MICHALE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. invocation of inherent jurisdiction to quash based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties have resolved their disputes amicably, with no objections. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. proceedings can be quashed based on the nature of offences and public interest. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in C.C.No.
191/2024 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kottayam, which has arisen from Crime No. 869/2024 registered by the Kottayam East Police Station, Kottayam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the third respondent, who has executed Annexure A3 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned counsel for the third respondent.
4. The le
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
