Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
POULOSE K L – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the application to quash is grounded in amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel confirmed successful resolution via mediation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial precedents endorse quashing in minor offences with settlement. (Para 6) |
| 4. proceedings quashed to prevent judicial burden and promote harmony. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the accused in C.C. No.70/2024 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Perumbavoor, which has arisen from Crime No. 1124/2023 registered by the Kuruppampady Police Station, Ernakulam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the third respondent, who has executed Annexure 5 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned counsel f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
