Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RAJEEVAN.M – Appellant
Versus
JEESHA P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts related to maintenance claim and family relationships. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding maintenance entitlement and financial capability. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's reasoning and final quantum of maintenance determined. (Para 6) |
| 4. court observations on earning capabilities and social justice. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. final conclusion regarding maintenance claims. (Para 11) |
“C.R.”
ORDER
Both these revision petitions have been filed challenging the order passed by the Family Court, Thalassery, in M.C. No.45/2017 dated 09.08.2017.
2. The first petitioner in the maintenance case before the Family Court is the legally wedded wife (for short ‘the wife’) of the respondent (for short ‘the husband’). Two children were born out of the wedlock. They are petitioners 2 and 3 before the Family Court. The wife and children filed the maintenance case against the husband, claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 15,000/- and Rs. 10,000/- each, respectively. The Family Court, after trial, rejected the claim of the wife for maintenance and granted monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs. 6,000/- each to the children. The wife filed RP(FC) No.409/2017, challenging the rejection of her c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
