Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
JUSTIN P.J. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application filed seeking bail under relevant statutes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding innocence and evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's conclusion on lack of evidence for continued detention. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.949/2025 of Anthikad Police Station, Thrissur. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused herein who is alleged to be part of an organised syndicate, took an amount of Rs.1 lakh to commit certain offences against one Mr. Anandan and thereby committed the offence alleged.
4. I have heard Smt.Anupama Subramanian, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C. Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
