SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53046

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MURALI G – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 13927 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.1223/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)
For the Respondents: Smt.M.K.Pushpalatha SR PP

The court allows bail based on lack of evidence and absence of prior criminal records, imposing conditions for compliance.

Headnote:This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail. The sole accused, applicant, was found in possession of 2 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, which violates Section 55(i) of the Abkari Act. The court determined that the applicant's continued detention is unnecessary due to lack of evidence connecting the applicant to the alleged crime. The application is allowed with specific conditions to ensure cooperation with the investigation and to prevent tampering with evidence.

Result: Application is allowed on prescribed conditions.

Table of Content
1. application for bail filed under relevant provisions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by both sides regarding the bail application. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's observations leading to the decision on bail. (Para 6)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.1223/2025 of Alathur Police Station, Palakkad. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 55 (i) of the Abkari Act , 1077.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

10.11.2025, at 08:55 hours, the applicant was found in possession of 2 litres or Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL), in contravention of the provisions of the Abkari Act , and thereby committed the offence alleged.

4. I have heard Sri.V.A.Johnson (Varikkappallil) V.A., the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt.M.K.Pushpalatha, he learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was arrested on 11.11.2025 and he has been in judicial custody since then. The investigation is almost over, the recovery has been effected, and the applicant has no criminal antecedents. For all these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. on every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top