SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53047

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ARUN.M.G – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 13939 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.127/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.P.PRIYESHKUMAR, SMT.DIVYA T.P., SMT.ADITHYA V.M.
For the Respondents: ADV M K PUSHPALATHA SR PP

The court granted bail emphasizing insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged crime, allowing release under specific conditions.

Headnote:This application concerns bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The accused was found in possession of 30 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, allegedly for sale, which violates provisions of the Kerala Abkari Act. The court found no significant evidence linking the accused to the crime and allowed bail, emphasizing that continued detention was unnecessary. The final outcome permits the applicant's release on bail under certain conditions.

Table of Content
1. possession of liquor constitutes an offence. (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding bail entitlement based on lack of evidence. (Para 4 , 5)
3. bail granted under specific conditions. (Para 6)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.127/2025 of Nadapuram Excise Range, Kozhikode District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 55 (a) and

58 of the Kerala Abkari Act .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

11.11.2025 at 07:30 p.m., at road margin of the State Highway Peringathoor - Nadapuram road at Kayappanichi, the applicant was found in possession of 30 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, for the purpose of sale, in contravention of the Abkari Act and Rules and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri. Priyesh Kumar M.P., the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. M.K. Pushpalatha, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was arrested on 12.11.2025 and he has been in judicial custody since then. The investigation is almost over and the recovery has already been effected. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. For all these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. on every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top