Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
AYSHA SHANAVAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 4425 OF 2021 | CRIME NO.2182/2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ADV SRI.ANCHAL C.VIJAYAN
For the Respondents: SRI.SANJAY JOHNSON, SMT.SREEDEVI S.

An application can be dismissed as infructuous if it loses its relevance over time.

Headnote:The Court analyzed CRL.MC submission regarding a dismissal due to being infructuous. It was submitted that the case had lost relevance, prompting the court's decision. The court framed the determination based on this submission and concluded there was no further merit to the matter leading to dismissal. The final decision was that the Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

ORDER

Dated this the 26^th day of November, 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Crl.M.C has become infructuous and hence it can be dismissed. In the light of the above submission, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JAYSHA SHANAVAS – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 4425 OF 2021 | CRIME NO.2182/2020

An application can be dismissed as infructuous if it loses its relevance over time.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
AYSHA SHANAVAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 4425 OF 2021 | CRIME NO.2182/2020