Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MUHAMMED ANSAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations and relationship dynamics. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding consent and relationship status. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis of consent and intention. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. final conclusions on the prosecution. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
Dated : 26th November, 2025 The petitioner is the sole accused in S.C.455/2023 on the file of the Special Court for SC/ST (PoA) Act Cases, Manjeri. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 366 , 376(2)(n), 201 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code , Section 66 (E) of the IT Act and Sections 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2) (v) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2. The prosecution case is that the accused who is not a member of the scheduled caste or scheduled tribe made contact with CW1 who is a member of the schedule caste community and on one day in May, 2017 took her in a motor cycle to his residence and committed rape upon her after promising to marry her. Thereafter, he took her to the residence of his elder brother at Pothanur in Tamil Nadu on several days and committed rape upon her. In 2018, while he was abroad, he obtained her nude photographs and videos and intimidat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
