Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
SABEEDA BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
NAZEEMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background in appeal litigation (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments about delay and lack of explanation (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. court's analysis on the appeal's dismissal (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal principles on condonation of delay (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. scope of interference under article 227 (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. dismissal of the petition (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
The orders passed by the Sub Court, Attingal on 01.11.2014 in I.A No.247/2012 and 248/2012 in A.S No.25/1989 are under challenge in this Original Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the additional second appellant in that case.
2. The petitioner and her sister, one Shanavas, were said to have been prosecuting A.S No.25/1989 before the Sub Court, Attingal, after the death of their mother Rehuma Beevi. According to the petitioner, her sister Shanavas was taking care of the aforesaid litigation, and she was under the impression that her sister had been doing all that were required for the proper and e ffective conduct of that appeal. It is further stated that the petitioner’s sister died during the year 2007, and that it was only in the year 2012 that she was able to contact the couns
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
