Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. JOHNSON JOHN, J
SURESHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
P. MADHU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to present by the appellant results in case closure. (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGMENT
This appeal filed by the complainant is against the acquittal of the 1st respondent/accused for the o Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881.
2. When there was no representation for the appellant, this Court issued notice to the appellant and in spite of service of notice, the appellant has not turned up and there is also no representation for the appellant.
Since, the appeal is of the year 2007 and the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter, in spite of receipt of notice from the Court, proceedings stands closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
