SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53059

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. JOHNSON JOHN, J
SURESHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
P. MADHU – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN, SHRI.SYAM J SAM
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

JUDGMENT

This appeal filed by the complainant is against the acquittal of the 1st respondent/accused for the o Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881.

2. When there was no representation for the appellant, this Court issued notice to the appellant and in spite of service of notice, the appellant has not turned up and there is also no representation for the appellant.

Since, the appeal is of the year 2007 and the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter, in spite of receipt of notice from the Court, proceedings stands closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top