IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
MADHUSOODHANAN – Appellant
Versus
1 RAVIKUMARAN NAIR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
First opposite party in ECC No.330 of 2017 of the Employees Compensation Commissioner (Industrial Tribunal), Thiruvananthapuram has filed this appeal. Son of the 1st respondent and the brother of the 2nd respondent – Sri.Sreekumar, while operating a hitachi machine in a quarry owned by the appellant, on 08.05.2013 at about 10.00 a.m. sustained serious injuries in an accident and succumbed to it. Before the Commissioner respondents 1 and 2 claimed an amount of Rs.10 lakhs as compensation from the appellant and the 3rd respondent – insurer. The Commissioner allowed the application and granted Rs.8,54,280/- as compensation with interest @ 12% from the date of accident till the deposit of the same. An amount of Rs.1,709/- was allowed as cost and Rs.5,000/- was allowed towards funeral expenses.
2. In the appeal, the main contention raised is that there was no evidence to prove the alleged employer-employee relationship between the appellant and the deceased. According to the appellant inspite of total lack of evidence to prove the employer-employee relationship, the Commissioner proceeded to hold that the deceased was an employee of the appellant and the accident arose out of an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.