Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S. TH, JJ
P G Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of transfer order under supervisory jurisdiction (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. tribunal's dismissal of transfer application (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments on caregiver status and transfer justification (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. scope of high court's supervisory powers (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. conditions for judicial interference in transfer orders (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. no grounds found to quash transfer order (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicant in O.A.No.1832 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’, in short) filed this original petition invoking supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging Ext.P1 order dated 12.11.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. Going by the averments in the original application, the petitioner is presently working as Deputy Labour Commissioner at Ettumanoor in Kottayam District in the Labour and Skills Department. He was posted to the said station consequent to his promotion on 05.08.2025. The home station of the petitioner is Kottayam District, and he is due to retire from service on 31.05
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
