SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53092

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SUBAIDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.A.MUJEEB
For the Respondents: SMT. SREEJA V.

JUDGMENT

The appellant challenges the order dated 21.04.2025 in M.C.No.36 of 2024 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court-II, Manjeri whereby she was imposed with a penalty of Rs.1,00,000/- for her failure to produce the 3rd accused in S.C.No.455 of 2020 to whom she had stood as one of the sureties.

2. S.C.No.455 of 2020 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court-II, Manjeri is a proceeding for the offence of murder. The appellant stood as the first surety for the 3rd accused in the said crime and executed a bond for Rs.1,00,000/-. In violation of the conditions of bond, the appellant was unable to produce the surety after he absconded. Bailable as well as non-bailable warrants were issued against the accused and thereafter proceedings were initiated against the sureties. Though the appellant sought time to produce the accused, she was unable to do so while the second surety expired in the meantime. After noticing that the surety was unable to produce the accused, penalty was imposed for the entire bond amount.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The impugned order itself reveals that the accused has subsequently

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top