SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
C.P.PAPPACHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 138 OF 2020 | Crl.A NO.96 OF 2019 | MC NO.204 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU, SRI.NAVANEETH.N.NATH, SHRI.RASSAL JANARDHANAN, A., SRI.P.U.PRATHEESH KUMAR
For the Respondents: PP-SRI.U.JAYAKRISHNAN

A case may be dismissed as not pressed upon the petitioner's request, reflecting the court's authority to determine procedural matters.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The judgment addresses proceedings under the Criminal Procedure Code relevant to OP(Crl.) dismissals. Facts of the Case: The petitioner requested for dismissal as not pressed.

Findings of Court:
The court noted the counsel's submission and proceeded to dismiss the case.

Issues: The court framed the question regarding the petitioner's intent to press the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that in light of the counsel's submission, dismissal was warranted.

Result: this O.P(Crl.) is dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of November, 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this O.P(Crl.) is not pressed and hence it can be dismissed as not pressed.

In the light of the above submission, this O.P(Crl.) is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top