Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SONY – Appellant
Versus
SISILY – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 157 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VISHNUPRASAD NAIR
For the Respondents: SR. PP-SMT.BINDU O.V.

The court upholds the dismissal of a case when the petitioner does not press the matter forward.

Headnote:The petitioner sought to dismiss the O.P(Crl.) on the grounds of pressing the matter. The court considered the submission and determined that the case could be dismissed as not pressed. The final decision concludes by dismissing the application, upholding the counsel's request.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25^th day of November, 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this O.P(Crl.) is not pressed and hence it can be dismissed as not pressed.

In the light of the above submission, this O.P(Crl.) is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JSONY – AppellantVersusSISILY – RespondentOP(CRL.) NO. 157 OF 2021

The court upholds the dismissal of a case when the petitioner does not press the matter forward.

Headnote:The petitioner sought to dismiss the O.P(Crl.) on the grounds of pressing the matter. The court considered the submission and determined that the case could be dismissed as not pressed. The final decision concludes by dismissing the application, upholding the counsel's request.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SONY – Appellant
Versus
SISILY – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 157 OF 2021