Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53107

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
JINU GEORGE, MARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
TR.P(CRL.) NO. 5 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.R.VINOD, SRI.S.ARAVIND
For the Respondents: SRI.E.C.POULOSE, SMT.BOBBY RAPHEAL.C

Transfer petition dismissed as infructuous upon petitioners' request.

Headnote:In this case, the petitioners submitted that the Transfer Petition (Criminal) became infructuous and hence the court must dismiss it. The court agreed with this submission, leading to the dismissal of the petition as infructuous. The petition's dismissal reflects the court's procedural consideration regarding the continuation of legal proceedings in light of the petitioners' request.

ORDER

Dated this the 25^th day of November, 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Tr.P(Crl.) has become infructuous and hence it can be dismissed.

In the light of the above submission, this Tr.P(Crl.) is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53107

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JJINU GEORGE, MARY – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentTR.P(CRL.) NO. 5 OF 2019

Transfer petition dismissed as infructuous upon petitioners' request.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
JINU GEORGE, MARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
TR.P(CRL.) NO. 5 OF 2019