Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
ANN MARIYA JOMY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. adherence to admission deadlines is essential; delays in governmental processes do not alter procedural rights. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. the duty of government entities to timely release scholarship guidelines crucial for student options. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.41830 of 2025 filed this writ appeal under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenging the judgment dated 11.11.2025, passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the appellant-petitioner joined the Government Dental College, Kannur, through the Medical admission process conducted in 2025. The appellant belongs to a Below Poverty Line category family. She secured the 7049th position in the Kerala State Medical Rank List. By judgment in S.L.P.(C) No. 9885 of 2020, the Honourable Supreme Court upheld the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C).No. 7771 of 2018 with modifications. As per the judgment in S.L.P.(C) No.9885 of 2020, the scholarship scheme declared for BPL category students is to be continued. Even though the judgment was pronounced in May 2025, the Government did not issue a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
