Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR, SMT.A.SALINI LAL
For the Respondents: PP-SRI.U.JAYAKRISHNAN

A criminal miscellaneous case is dismissed as infructuous when no merit remains based on counsel's submissions.

Headnote:The present judgment relates to CRL.MC NO. 1868 OF 2020 concerning a petition that has become infructuous. The petitioners, represented by learned counsel, highlighted the matter's status, leading to the court’s determination. The court found the basis for dismissal clear in the submissions made by the petitioners. The primary issue addressed was whether the petition still held merit. The court noted that the counsel’s indications verified the petition's current status, warranting a dismissal on those grounds. Thus, acknowledging the matter's infructuous nature, the court concluded that the current criminal miscellaneous case must be dismissed.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous and hence this Crl.M.C could be dismissed as infructuous.

In the light of the above submission, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :