Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHIYAF V T, RISHAF V T, MUHAMMED AZHAR P, MUHAMMED MUBASHIR K, MUHAMMED SALIH K, MUHAMMED SHIYAS K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court assesses the case's nature and settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel confirms resolution and lack of grievance. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. inherent power's scope in non-grievous cases. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R Dated this the 24th day of November, 2025 The petitioners are the accused 1 to 6 in C.C.No.932/2025 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Njarakkal (Trial Court) which has arisen from Crime No.486/2024 registered by the Njarakkal Police Station, Ernakulam alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Sections 120B, 201 and 379 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure B affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the second respondent.
4. The learn
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
