Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MUHAMMED JURAIJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the dispute underlying the case was settled amicably. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. both parties agree to dismiss the proceedings. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. inherent jurisdiction can be exercised to quash ungrievous offenses with a settlement. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R Dated this the 24th day of November, 2025 The petitioners are the accused 1 to 4 in Crime No.1653 of 2025 registered by the Thodupuzha Police Station, Idukki alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115(2) and 118(1) r/w Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ( BNS ).
2. The petitioners has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure 3 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the second respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the inte
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
