Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHAMSUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner applied for quashing based on a settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. settlement reached between parties as confirmed by counsel. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court considers judicial precedents in applying inherent powers. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R Dated this the 24th day of November, 2025 The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.873 of
2024 registered by the Hill Palace Police Station, Ernakulam alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 296(b) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ( BNS ).
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure AII affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the second respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
