SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53164

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MOHAMMED THANSEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.SAMSUDIN
For the Respondents: SRI.M.ANUROOP, SMT.SEETHA

O R D E R

Dated this the 24th day of November, 2025 The petitioner is the accused in S.C.No.587/2025 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court-III, Manjeri, which has arisen from Crime No.201/2025 registered by the Mancherry Police Station, Malappuram, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 117(3), 118(1) and 238(c) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 and Section 92 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act .

2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure-A3 affidavit, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.

4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The 2nd respondent has no subsisting

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top