Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
KANNADAN ANWAR SALIH – Appellant
Versus
SAFEEKHATH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal proceedings initiated regarding maintenance and divorce rights. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's decisions on maintenance amounts and obligations discussed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. the enforceability of maintenance rights post-divorce under applicable laws. (Para 6 , 9) |
“C.R.”
JUDGMENT
Both the original petition and the revision petition are connected, and I am disposing of them by a common judgment.
2. The revision petition arose out of an order passed by the Family Court, Tirur in a petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C . and the original petition arose out of an order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Tirur (for short, 'the Magistrate Court') and confirmed by the Additional Sessions Court-III, Manjeri under Section 3 (1) of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (for short, 'the Muslim Women Protection Act, 1986').
3. The petitioner in both matters is the husband of respondent No.1 and father of respondent No.2 (in RP(FC) No.155 of 2015). The parties are Muslims and governed by Muslim Personal Law. The marriage and paternity are not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner divorced respondent No.1 on 13.04.2011
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
