IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
JOHN VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
N.P.GEORGEKUTTY – Respondent
O R D E R
This revision petition has been filed challenging the conviction and sentence in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the NI Act’).
2. The petitioner was convicted and sentenced by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thiruvalla (for short ‘the trial court’) in S.T. No.751/2007 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act. The appeal preferred by the petitioner before the Additional Sessions Court-III, Pathanamthitta as Crl.A. No.59/2011 was allowed in part, modifying the sentence and confirming the conviction.
3. I have heard Sri.Madhusudanan P.R., the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.E.C. Bineesh, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor and Sri.E.D. George, the learned counsel for the third respondent.
4. The complainant before the trial court, who is the first respondent herein, is no more. His legal heir has been impleaded as the third respondent. Now, the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the third respondent and Crl.M.A No.6/2025 has been been filed to compound the offence under Section 359 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ). It is submitted that the entir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.