Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53362

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SREEKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SANGEETHA – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 809 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.R.LEELA, SHRI.ARJUN GOPAL P.

The court affirmed the procedural liberty to withdraw a petition and seek redress in the Family Court.

Headnote:The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the original petition, which was granted. The Family Court's jurisdiction is affirmed, allowing for further proceedings therein. The court highlighted the importance of procedural liberty in family matters while dismissing the case. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the same day.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this original petition with liberty to approach the Family Court, North Paravur. Permission is granted.

This original petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the above liberty.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53362

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JSREEKUMAR – AppellantVersusSANGEETHA – RespondentOP(CRL.) NO. 809 OF 2025

The court affirmed the procedural liberty to withdraw a petition and seek redress in the Family Court.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SREEKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SANGEETHA – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 809 OF 2025