Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MUNEERA A. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. need for prison leave for family marriage (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel's arguments presented before the court (Para 3) |
| 3. court's directive based on rules amidst election constraints (Para 4) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is the wife of Mr.Shameer, who is undergoing imprisonment at the Open Prison and Correctional Home, Nettukaltheri, Thiruvananthapuram.
2. The convict's nephew's marriage is fixed on
30.11.2025, as evident from Ext.P1 invitation letter. Ext.P3 application has been submitted by the petitioner seeking emergency leave for the convict to attend the marriage. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said application has not been considered due to the declaration of the local body election. It is in these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court.
3. I have heard Sri.E.A.Haris, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Sangeetha Raj N.R., the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that the enquiry confirms that the convict's nephew's marriage is fixed on 30.11.2025. However, no action was taken on the application filed by the petitioner for emergency leave due to the issuance of the Election Model
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
