Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.TH, JJ
JAYANTHI.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for lecturer position based on rank list. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's argument on reservation rights. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. jurisdiction and limitations of supervisory review. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. dismissal of application due to expiration of rank list. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. final ruling on the case. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicant in O.A.No.338 of 2020 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Additional Bench at Ernakulam (the ‘Tribunal’, in short), filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging Ext.P4 order dated 19.05.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. Going by the averments in the original application, the petitioner applied for the post of Lecturer in Kannada on UGC Scale in Collegiate Education Department (Category No. 581/2012) as per the notification issued by the 3rd respondent, and after written test and interview, the 3rd respondent issued Annexure A1 rank list which came into effect as on 17.03.2017 and currency of rank list came to an end on 16.03.2020. In Annexure A1 rank list, the name of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
