SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53379

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
JAMSHEER P.V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 6174 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.RAJEEV, SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN, SRI.V.VINAY, SHRI.SARATH K.P.
For the Respondents: ADV SHRI.ANAND KALYANAKRISHNAN

The court dismisses the case as infructuous based on the petitioner's submission regarding changed circumstances.

Headnote:The court analyzed the case under the POCSO Act regarding a criminal miscellaneous case filed by the petitioner concerning a pending special court trial. The petitioner contended that the case had become infructuous due to changing circumstances. The court found sufficient grounds to dismiss the matter reaffirming its procedural correctness. The concluding statement of the judgment noted the dismissal of the case on grounds of being infructuous.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous and hence this Crl.M.C could be dismissed as infructuous.

In the light of the above submission, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top