IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SEETHA N.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
The petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.181 of
2025 registered by the Pattanakkad Police Station, Alappuzha, alleging commission of the offences punishable under Section 61 (2), 316(5), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) and 318(4) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (' BNS ', in short).
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that the other accused in the crime have paid the entire outstanding amount due to the KSFE. Therefore, the 3rd respondent has no objection in the entire proceedings being quashed.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the Investigating Officer has reported that the parties have arrived at a genuine and bona fi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.