SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53387

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
V.VINOD – Appellant
Versus
AFSAL.P – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN
For the Respondents: SRI.M.P.PRASANTH

C.S.DIAS, J.

---------------------------------------------

Crl.M.C. No.10708 OF 2025 ----------------------------------------------

Dated this the 27th day of November, 2025 ORDER Aggrieved by Annexure A1 judgment passed by the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Payyannur, in ST No.150/2020, convicting and sentencing the petitioner for allegedly committing an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881, the petitioner has preferred Annexure A2 appeal before the Court of Session, Thalassery, which has been numbered as Crl.Appeal No.360/2025. However, there was a delay in filing the appeal. Even though the petitioner has filed Annexure A3 petition to condone the delay and Annexure A4 petition to suspend the sentence of imprisonment and fine, the said applications have not been considered till date. In the meantime, coercive proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner. The petitioner is apprehensive that during the pendency of Annexures A2 to A4 the petitioner may be remanded to judicial custody. Hence, the Criminal Miscellaneous Case.

2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. In view of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top