SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53391

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
PRAMOSH.V.A – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.MADHU, SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI
For the Respondents: SRI RENJIT GEORGE, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Crl.M.C.

need not be continued, since the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Crl.M.C. is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top