SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53392

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
VISHNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2614 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR, SMT.A.SALINI LAL
For the Respondents: SMT.SEENA (PP)

The court determined that continuation of the Crl.M.C. was not necessary due to the prior resolution of the case by the Magistrate.

Headnote:The court examined the Final Report numbered S.T.No.1730/2020 filed regarding FIR 1694/2020. The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Adoor, previously disposed of the case by imposing a fine. The court found that quashing the FIR was unnecessary due to this resolution. The key issue framed was whether to continue with the Crl.M.C. given the prior disposal. The court concluded that no further action was warranted, thus closing the Crl.M.C.

Table of Content
1. final report considered; no further action needed. (Para 1)
2. crl.m.c. is closed. (Para 2)

ORDER

The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the Final Report filed in this case was numbered as S.T.No.1730/2020 by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Adoor, and that the said case had already been disposed of by imposing fine, on 09.05.2024.

2. In the above circumstances, there is no need to continue this Crl.M.C., to quash the FIR in the said case.

The Crl.M.C. is accordingly closed. sd/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top