SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
HAMZA – Appellant
Versus
ABIDA P A – Respondent
RPFC NO. 217 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIDHI BALACHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SMT.HEMALATHA-R, SRI.BINU GEORGE

Failure to comply with court orders negates the possibility of condonation of delays in appeals.

Headnote:The present appeal concerns compliance with the order issued in Crl.M.A. No.2 of 2024. The petitioner failed to deposit Rs.1,50,000/- as required. The court found no merit in the delay condonation application and thus dismissed the revision petition. The main issues included timely compliance and its implications on the revision process.

O R D E R

The learned Counsel for the respondents submits that the order passed by this Court in Crl.M.A. No.2 of 2024 on 16.10.2025 to deposit Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One lakh fifty thousand only) has not been complied with. Hence, the delay condonation application is dismissed. Consequently, the revision petition is also dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top