SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53406

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MANU.G – Appellant
Versus
ARATHI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL, SRI.ANIL BABU, SMT.ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW, SMT.NEENA ELISABATH ANTONY
For the Respondents: SRI. U. JAYAKRISHNAN

J U D G M E N T Dated this the 28th day of November, 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous and hence this O.P(Crl) could be dismissed as infructuous.

In the light of the above submission, this O.P(Crl) is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top