Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53406

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MANU.G – Appellant
Versus
ARATHI – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 332 OF 2024 | Crl.A NO.177 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL, SRI.ANIL BABU, SMT.ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW, SMT.NEENA ELISABATH ANTONY
For the Respondents: SRI. U. JAYAKRISHNAN

An OP (Crl) may be dismissed as infructuous if the matter no longer remains viable or relevant.

Headnote:The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioner, leading to a conclusion that the ongoing matter was no longer relevant. No legal arguments were presented that would necessitate further court intervention, and the ruling concluded the case.

J U D G M E N T Dated this the 28^th day of November, 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous and hence this O.P(Crl) could be dismissed as infructuous.

In the light of the above submission, this O.P(Crl) is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53406

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JMANU.G – AppellantVersusARATHI – RespondentOP(CRL.) NO. 332 OF 2024 | Crl.A NO.177 OF 2023

An OP (Crl) may be dismissed as infructuous if the matter no longer remains viable or relevant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MANU.G – Appellant
Versus
ARATHI – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 332 OF 2024 | Crl.A NO.177 OF 2023