Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53407

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ELZA PETER – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR KAKKANAD – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 544 OF 2018 | MC NO.13 OF 2017

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE
For the Respondents: SMT.BINDU O.V.

The court dismissed the application as not pressed, affirming that dismissal is appropriate when a petitioner withdraws their application.

Headnote:The petitioner submitted that the OP(Crl) is not pressed, and the court recorded this submission. Ultimately, the OP(Crl) was dismissed as not pressed. This ruling was determined by the honorable judge on the 28th day of November, 2025, and conveys the court's decision regarding the petitioner's application.

J U D G M E N T Dated this the 28^th day of November, 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this OP(Crl) is not pressed. Recording the submission, the OP(Crl) is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53407

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JELZA PETER – AppellantVersusDISTRICT COLLECTOR KAKKANAD – RespondentOP(CRL.) NO. 544 OF 2018 | MC NO.13 OF 2017

The court dismissed the application as not pressed, affirming that dismissal is appropriate when a petitioner withdraws their application.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ELZA PETER – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR KAKKANAD – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 544 OF 2018 | MC NO.13 OF 2017