SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53410

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
SURESH BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEWS
For the Respondents: SRI.M.V.S.NAMPOOTHIRY, SRI.RENJIT GEORGE - SR.PP

ORDER

The learned counsel representing the petitioner and the party respondent submitted that the issue has been amicably settled between the parties before the Trial Court, and hence this Crl.M.C.

need not be continued.

Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel representing both sides, the Crl.M.C. stands closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top