SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53411

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
MUHAMMED NAVAS C V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 13703 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SAGITH KUMAR V., SMT.BABILA K.K., SMT.DEVAPRIYA S., SMT.MEGHA S.
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C.ASHI, SR.PP

Conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act significantly limit bail in drug-related offenses.

Headnote:The application seeks bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, with the petitioner as accused in Crime No. 500/2025 facing charges under Sections 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution claims possession of 0.298Kg of methamphetamine. The court finds that the conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are met, leading to the dismissal of the bail application.

Table of Content
1. allegations of drug possession and its implications. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments presented by both the petitioner and prosecution on bail. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's reasoning for denying bail based on legal standards. (Para 8)

O R D E R

This is an application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

2. The petitioner is accused No.1 in Crime No.500/2025 of Feroke Police Station, Kozhikode. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 22 (c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

3. The prosecution case, as narrated in Ext.P4 order, reads thus:

“ At about 22 hours on 20.05.2025, the petitioner along with other accused were found in conscious possession and transportation of 0.298Kg of methamphetamine in a car bearing registration No. MH-20-AY-9990 at Ramanattukara Fly Over Junction. The accused possessed MDMA in violation of the provisions of Section 8 (c) of the NDPS Act and thus committed the above mentioned offence.”(sic)

4. The petitioner was arrested on 20.05.2025 and he has been in judicial custody since then.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the investigation is over and the Police have submitted the final report.

7. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor opposed the bail plea of the petitioner contending that the bar contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act is applicable to the facts of the case.

8. I have gone through the Case Diary, which reveals that the petitioner was found in possession of commercial quantity of MDMA. There are no reasonable ground for believing that the petitioner is not guilty of the offences and that he will not commit any offence while on bail. Therefore, I am of the view that this is a case in which the twin conditions mentioned in Section 37 (1)(b) of the NDPS Act are applicable.

The bail application stands dismissed as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top