Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SURJITH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of alleged offences and the details of the incident. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail based on severity of injuries and previous conduct. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's consideration of past criminal behaviour and gravity of allegations. (Para 8 , 9) |
K.BABU, J.
--------------------------------------
B.A No.14034 of 2025 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of November, 2025 O R D E R This is an application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1000/2025 of Kattoor Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 126 (2), 117(3) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 ( BNS ).
3. The prosecution case, as narrated in Annexure 2 order, read thus:
“On 25-10-2025 at 22:30 hours, near to Chembazhanthi Auditorium, at Edakkulam, accused wrongfully restrained the nephew of defacto complainant and assaulted him. Thereby he sustained injuries to his kidney and other parts.”[SIC]
4. The petitioner was arrested on 03.11.2025 and he has been in judicial custody since then.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the peti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
